Skip to content
Touchline

Search

Jump to a club, a player, or a section

Chelsea

Enzo Fernández

Midfielder25 yrs
Non-penalty xG per 90
0.196 non-penalty goals from 53 shots
Expected assists per 90
0.247 assists, 77 key passes
Finishing
+0.47goals above what the league converts the same chances into
Build-up per 90
0.338% of Chelsea’s build-up value

Enzo Fernández ranks 95th of 397 qualified players for attacking involvement, shooting from 18.4m on average. They carry 12% of Chelsea’s attacking involvement, the 2nd largest share in the squad.

Against their position

137 midfielders

Shooting

per 90
Goals
0.18
Non-penalty goals
0.18
xG
0.19
Non-penalty xG
0.19
Shots
1.62
npxG per shot
0.12
Shot distance
18.4m
Set-piece share
4%
Goals against xG
-0.1

2 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2024/25.

Creating

per 90
Assists
0.21
Expected assists
0.24
Key passes
2.36
npxG + xA
0.42
xG chain
0.64
xG build-up
0.33
Assists against xA
-0.7

On the ball

per 90

6 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2024/25.

Defending

per 90

7 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2024/25.

Discipline

per 90
Yellow cards
8season count
Red cards
0season count

3 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2024/25.

Ranked against 137 midfielders with half a match a round or more, the same comparison the compare page makes. Where less is better, such as being dispossessed, the order is turned round, so a high percentile is always the good end.

This week

Gameweek 8

Next fixture

Gameweek 8

away to Aston Villa

Sat 24 Oct, 11:30 UTC

Aston Villa concede 12.2 shots a match and are 1.10× the league norm against midfielders. Roughly an average matchup.

Projected shots
1.65

1.62 per 90 × 1.02

Projected on target
0.56

0.61 per 90 × 0.92

Season rate times what this opponent concedes, over a full ninety minutes. Check availability.

Shots

36 appearances
  • Over 0.527 of 3675%± 7
  • Over 1.516 of 3644%± 8
  • Over 2.57 of 3619%± 7
  • Over 3.53 of 368%± 5

The band is one standard error, the tick the estimate. Blanks count as misses, 9 of 36.

Shooting profile

53 shots

Where they shoot

53 shots
Every shotBy zone
4% of shots, 2 shots6% of shots, 3 shots2% of shots, 1 shot2% of shots, 1 shot9% of shots, 5 shots4% of shots, 2 shots2% of shots, 1 shot4% of shots, 2 shots6% of shots, 3 shots4% of shots, 2 shots4% of shots, 2 shots2% of shots, 1 shot2% of shots, 1 shot9% of shots, 5 shots6% of shots, 3 shots2% of shots, 1 shot4% of shots, 2 shots8% of shots, 4 shots4% of shots, 2 shots2% of shots, 1 shot4% of shots, 2 shots2% of shots, 1 shot4% of shots, 2 shots4% of shots, 2 shots2% of shots, 1 shot2% of shots, 1 shot9%9%8%Opponent goalLeftRight
Share of shots<1%1–2%2–4%4–6%6%+

Enzo Fernández, 2024/25, final 35m.

left
12%
Centre
65%
right
23%

share of their shooting xG

Chance profile

quality, volume and route
xG per shot
0.116
Shots per 90
1.62
Key passes per 90
2.36
Average shot distance
18.4m
From set pieces
4%

How the chances arrive

Crosses
22%
Through balls
0%
Own dribble
2%
Headed
29%

Club role

Chelsea

What they are for

  • Corners and set piecesSupplies 13% of Chelsea’s dead-ball danger, from 16 deliveries that became shots.
  • When it mattered4 of 6 goals came with the game level or Chelsea behind.
  • On the pitch86% of available minutes.

What would actually have to be replaced. Losing the penalty taker is not the same as losing a proportional slice of Enzo Fernández’soutput.

Chances received

who supplies them
  1. Pedro Neto1.7 xG7 shots, 2g
  2. Cole Palmer1.2 xG6 shots, 2g
  3. Moisés Caicedo0.5 xG4 shots, 0g
  4. Noni Madueke0.4 xG4 shots, 0g
  5. Tyrique George0.4 xG2 shots, 0g

Chances created

who they supply
  1. Nicolas Jackson2.2 xG17 shots, 3g
  2. Cole Palmer1.2 xG11 shots, 0g
  3. Christopher Nkunku0.8 xG7 shots, 0g
  4. Noni Madueke0.8 xG12 shots, 0g
  5. Axel Disasi0.5 xG1 shot, 1g

Season record

2024/25

Involvement in build-up

excludes their own shots and final passes

Enzo Fernández carries 8.0% of Chelsea’s build-up value.

  • Build-up per 900.328
    70% of midfielders
  • Possession value per 900.638
    85% of midfielders

Ranked against 137 midfielders with a comparable sample. Build-up is the value of possessions a player was involved in, with their own shots and final passes removed, so it credits the work before the chance rather than the chance.

Match by match

Match log

36 appearances, oldest first

v Man City3 shots
1 on target

v Forest1 shot
1 on target

at Man Utd1 shot
0 on target

1g

at Leicester3 shots
1 on target

1g

v Villa1 shot
1 on target

at Southampton1 shot
0 on target

1g

at Spurs3 shots
1 on target

v Brentford2 shots
1 on target

at Everton2 shots
1 on target

v Fulham1 shot
1 on target

at Ipswich2 shots
0 on target

at Palace2 shots
0 on target

v Bournemouth2 shots
1 on target

at Man City1 shot
0 on target

v West Ham2 shots
0 on target

at Brighton1 shot
0 on target

1g

at Villa4 shots
2 on target

v Southampton1 shot
1 on target

v Leicester4 shots
2 on target

at Arsenal2 shots
0 on target

1g

v Spurs2 shots
1 on target

at Brentford4 shots
1 on target

v Ipswich3 shots
2 on target

v Everton1 shot
0 on target

1g

v Liverpool2 shots
1 on target

at Newcastle1 shot
1 on target

v Man Utd1 shot
0 on target

9 blanksno shot
not placed

Height is shots, solid is on target, and the dashed rule is the 1.5 line. The feed cannot date an appearance with no shot in it, so 9 sits at the end, counted but unplaced.

How to read the ties. Each rate ties back to the league average: solid where the sample is settled, broken where it is still being shrunk toward the league, an open circle where there is no cohort to rank against.