Skip to content
Touchline

Search

Jump to a club, a player, or a section

Fulham

Emile Smith-Rowe

Midfielder26 yrs
Non-penalty xG per 90
0.236 non-penalty goals from 37 shots
Expected assists per 90
0.103 assists, 24 key passes
Finishing
+1.26goals above what the league converts the same chances into
Build-up per 90
0.295% of Fulham’s build-up value

Emile Smith-Rowe ranks 125th of 397 qualified players for attacking involvement, shooting from 16.0m on average. They carry 8% of Fulham’s attacking involvement, the 6th largest share in the squad.

Against their position

137 midfielders

Shooting

per 90
Goals
0.26
Non-penalty goals
0.26
xG
0.23
Non-penalty xG
0.23
Shots
1.58
npxG per shot
0.14
Shot distance
16.0m
Set-piece share
12%
Goals against xG
+0.7

2 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2024/25.

Creating

per 90
Assists
0.13
Expected assists
0.10
Key passes
1.03
npxG + xA
0.33
xG chain
0.54
xG build-up
0.29
Assists against xA
+0.6

On the ball

per 90

6 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2024/25.

Defending

per 90

7 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2024/25.

Discipline

per 90
Yellow cards
3season count
Red cards
0season count

3 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2024/25.

Ranked against 137 midfielders with half a match a round or more, the same comparison the compare page makes. Where less is better, such as being dispossessed, the order is turned round, so a high percentile is always the good end.

This week

Gameweek 8

Next fixture

Gameweek 8

away to Coventry

Sat 24 Oct, 14:00 UTC

No shot record for Coventry in this season, so no opponent adjustment is possible. Newly promoted sides have no Premier League history to measure.

Season rate times what this opponent concedes, over a full ninety minutes. Check availability.

Shots

34 appearances
  • Over 0.520 of 3459%± 8
  • Over 1.514 of 3441%± 8
  • Over 2.53 of 349%± 5
  • Over 3.50 of 340%± 0

The band is one standard error, the tick the estimate. Blanks count as misses, 14 of 34.

Shooting profile

37 shots

Where they shoot

37 shots
Every shotBy zone
3% of shots, 1 shot3% of shots, 1 shot16% of shots, 6 shots3% of shots, 1 shot8% of shots, 3 shots14% of shots, 5 shots3% of shots, 1 shot3% of shots, 1 shot3% of shots, 1 shot16% of shots, 6 shots5% of shots, 2 shots3% of shots, 1 shot3% of shots, 1 shot5% of shots, 2 shots5% of shots, 2 shots5% of shots, 2 shots3% of shots, 1 shot16%8%14%16%Opponent goalLeftRight
Share of shots<1%1–2%2–4%4–6%6%+

Emile Smith-Rowe, 2024/25, final 35m.

left
37%
Centre
60%
right
4%

share of their shooting xG

Chance profile

quality, volume and route
xG per shot
0.142
Shots per 90
1.58
Key passes per 90
1.03
Average shot distance
16.0m
From set pieces
12%

How the chances arrive

Crosses
13%
Through balls
9%
Own dribble
0%
Headed
30%

Club role

Fulham

What they are for

  • When it mattered5 of 6 goals came with the game level or Fulham behind.
  • On the pitch61% of available minutes.

What would actually have to be replaced. Losing the penalty taker is not the same as losing a proportional slice of Emile Smith-Rowe’soutput.

Chances received

who supplies them
  1. Adama Traoré1.2 xG6 shots, 2g
  2. Alex Iwobi1.1 xG6 shots, 2g
  3. Raúl Jiménez1.0 xG3 shots, 1g
  4. Sasa Lukic1.0 xG4 shots, 1g
  5. Harry Wilson0.2 xG2 shots, 0g

Chances created

who they supply
  1. Raúl Jiménez1.3 xG4 shots, 2g
  2. Alex Iwobi0.4 xG7 shots, 1g
  3. Andreas Pereira0.3 xG5 shots, 0g
  4. Reiss Nelson0.2 xG4 shots, 0g
  5. Adama Traoré0.1 xG2 shots, 0g

Season record

2024/25

Involvement in build-up

excludes their own shots and final passes

Emile Smith-Rowe carries 5.4% of Fulham’s build-up value.

  • Build-up per 900.294
    58% of midfielders
  • Possession value per 900.536
    71% of midfielders

Ranked against 137 midfielders with a comparable sample. Build-up is the value of possessions a player was involved in, with their own shots and final passes removed, so it credits the work before the chance rather than the chance.

Match by match

Match log

34 appearances, oldest first
1g

v Leicester2 shots
1 on target

at Ipswich2 shots
0 on target

v West Ham3 shots
0 on target

1g

v Newcastle3 shots
1 on target

at Forest2 shots
0 on target

at Everton2 shots
0 on target

v Brentford2 shots
1 on target

1g

at Palace2 shots
1 on target

v Ipswich1 shot
0 on target

at West Ham2 shots
0 on target

1g

at Leicester2 shots
1 on target

v Man Utd1 shot
0 on target

at Newcastle2 shots
2 on target

1g

v Forest3 shots
1 on target

v Palace1 shot
0 on target

at Brighton1 shot
0 on target

v Spurs1 shot
0 on target

1g

at Southampton2 shots
2 on target

at Villa1 shot
0 on target

at Brentford2 shots
1 on target

14 blanksno shot
not placed

Height is shots, solid is on target, and the dashed rule is the 1.5 line. The feed cannot date an appearance with no shot in it, so 14 sits at the end, counted but unplaced.

How to read the ties. Each rate ties back to the league average: solid where the sample is settled, broken where it is still being shrunk toward the league, an open circle where there is no cohort to rank against.