Skip to content
Touchline

Search

Jump to a club, a player, or a section

Ipswich

Emersonn

Forward22 yrsPenalties 2nd
Non-penalty xG per 90
0.382 non-penalty goals from 14 shots
Expected assists per 90
0.221 assists, 6 key passes
Finishing
+0.15goals above what the league converts the same chances into
Build-up per 90
0.174% of Ipswich’s build-up value

Emersonn ranks 14th of 138 qualified players for attacking involvement, shooting from 10.9m on average. They carry 16% of Ipswich’s attacking involvement, the 2nd largest share in the squad.

Against their position

23 forwards

Average match rating6.73

Shooting

per 90
Goals
0.37
Non-penalty goals
0.37
xG
0.38
Non-penalty xG
0.38
Shots
2.59
Shots on target
0.67
Shot accuracy
–not ranked
npxG per shot
0.15
Shot distance
10.9m
Set-piece share
2%
Goals against xG
-0.1

Creating

per 90
Assists
0.19
Expected assists
0.22
Key passes
1.11
npxG + xA
0.60
xG chain
0.71
xG build-up
0.17
Assists against xA
-0.2

On the ball

per 90
Touches
17.33
Passes
5.67
Pass completion
–not ranked
Take-ons attempted
1.33
Take-on success
–not ranked
Dispossessed
0.67

Defending

per 90
Tackles
1.33
Tackles won
–not ranked
Interceptions
0.00
Clearances
1.00
Aerials won
1.33
Aerial success
27%
Dribbled past
0.67

Discipline

per 90
Fouls committed
0.33
Caught offside
0.67
Errors
0season count
Yellow cards
0season count
Red cards
0season count

Ranked against 23 forwards with half a match a round or more, the same comparison the compare page makes. Where less is better, such as being dispossessed, the order is turned round, so a high percentile is always the good end.

This week

Gameweek 8

Next fixture

Gameweek 8

vs Nottingham Forest

Fri 23 Oct, 19:00 UTC

Nottingham Forest concede 11.0 shots a match and are 0.86× the league norm against central attack (18 shots so far). A difficult one.

Projected shots
2.14

2.59 per 90 × 0.83

Projected on target
0.63

0.74 per 90 × 0.85

Season rate times what this opponent concedes, over a full ninety minutes. Check availability.

Shots

7 appearances
  • Over 0.55 of 771%± 17
  • Over 1.54 of 757%± 19
  • Over 2.52 of 729%± 17
  • Over 3.50 of 70%± 0

The band is one standard error, the tick the estimate. Blanks count as misses, 2 of 7.

Shooting profile

14 shots

Where they shoot

14 shots
Every shotBy zone
Opponent goalLeftRight
GoalNo goalMark area is the chance’s expected goals

Emersonn, 2026/27, 11 shots in the final 35m, 2 scored.

left
0%
Centre
91%
right
9%

share of their shooting xG

Chance profile

quality, volume and route
xG per shot
0.148
Shots per 90
2.59
Key passes per 90
1.11
Average shot distance
10.9m
From set pieces
2%

How the chances arrive

Crosses
47%
Through balls
0%
Own dribble
4%
Headed
47%

Club role

Ipswich

What they are for

  • On the pitch90% of available minutes.

What would actually have to be replaced. Losing the penalty taker is not the same as losing a proportional slice of Emersonn’soutput.

Chances received

who supplies them
  1. Julio Enciso0.9 xG3 shots, 1g
  2. Leif Davis0.5 xG2 shots, 1g
  3. Dara O'Shea0.2 xG4 shots, 0g
  4. Florentino Luís0.0 xG1 shot, 0g
  5. Jack Clarke0.0 xG1 shot, 0g

Chances created

who they supply
  1. Julio Enciso0.7 xG4 shots, 0g
  2. Leif Davis0.5 xG1 shot, 1g

Season record

2026/27

Involvement in build-up

excludes their own shots and final passes

Emersonn carries 4.1% of Ipswich’s build-up value.

  • Build-up per 900.169
    50% of forwards
  • Possession value per 900.713
    56% of forwards

Ranked against 16 forwards with a comparable sample. Build-up is the value of possessions a player was involved in, with their own shots and final passes removed, so it credits the work before the chance rather than the chance.

Match by match

Match log

7 appearances, oldest first
1g

v Sunderland3 shots
2 on target

v Liverpool1 shot
0 on target

1g

at Palace3 shots
1 on target

at Everton2 shots
1 on target

v Fulham2 shots
0 on target

2 blanksno shot
not placed

Height is shots, solid is on target, and the dashed rule is the 1.5 line. The feed cannot date an appearance with no shot in it, so 2 sits at the end, counted but unplaced.

How to read the ties. Each rate ties back to the league average: solid where the sample is settled, broken where it is still being shrunk toward the league, an open circle where there is no cohort to rank against.