Skip to content
Touchline

Search

Jump to a club, a player, or a section

Eberechi Eze

Midfielder28 yrs
Non-penalty xG per 90
0.297 non-penalty goals from 102 shots
Expected assists per 90
0.248 assists, 58 key passes
Finishing
-0.53goals above what the league converts the same chances into
Build-up per 90
0.309% of Crystal Palace’s build-up value

Eberechi Eze ranks 51st of 397 qualified players for attacking involvement, shooting from 20.9m on average, with 30% of their danger coming from set pieces. They carry 13% of Crystal Palace’s attacking involvement, the 3rd largest share in the squad.

Against their position

104 forwards

Shooting

per 90
Goals
0.27
Non-penalty goals
0.24
xG
0.34
Non-penalty xG
0.29
Shots
3.48
npxG per shot
0.08
Shot distance
20.9m
Set-piece share
30%
Goals against xG
-1.4

2 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2024/25.

Creating

per 90
Assists
0.27
Expected assists
0.24
Key passes
1.98
npxG + xA
0.53
xG chain
0.64
xG build-up
0.30
Assists against xA
+1.0

On the ball

per 90

6 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2024/25.

Defending

per 90

7 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2024/25.

Discipline

per 90
Yellow cards
1season count
Red cards
0season count

3 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2024/25.

Ranked against 104 forwards with half a match a round or more, the same comparison the compare page makes. Where less is better, such as being dispossessed, the order is turned round, so a high percentile is always the good end.

This week

Gameweek 7

Next fixture

Gameweek 7

away to Nottingham Forest

Sun 18 Oct, 15:30 UTC

Nottingham Forest concede 14.0 shots a match and are 1.07× the league norm against forwards. Roughly an average matchup.

Projected shots
3.74

3.48 per 90 × 1.07

Projected on target
0.97

0.99 per 90 × 0.98

Season rate times what this opponent concedes, over a full ninety minutes. Check availability.

Shots

34 appearances
  • Over 0.531 of 3491%± 5
  • Over 1.526 of 3476%± 7
  • Over 2.519 of 3456%± 9
  • Over 3.514 of 3441%± 8

The band is one standard error, the tick the estimate. Blanks count as misses, 3 of 34.

Shooting profile

102 shots

Where they shoot

102 shots
Opponent goalLeftRight
GoalNo goalMark area is the chance’s expected goals

Eberechi Eze, 2024/25, 101 shots in the final 35m, 8 scored.

left
41%
Centre
54%
right
5%

share of their shooting xG

Chance profile

quality, volume and route
xG per shot
0.097
Shots per 90
3.48
Key passes per 90
1.98
Average shot distance
20.9m
From set pieces
30%

How the chances arrive

Crosses
14%
Through balls
12%
Own dribble
9%
Headed
2%

Club role

Crystal Palace

What they are for

  • PenaltiesTakes them: 2 of 4 Crystal Palace were awarded.
  • Corners and set piecesSupplies 9% of Crystal Palace’s dead-ball danger, from 22 deliveries that became shots.
  • When it mattered6 of 8 goals came with the game level or Crystal Palace behind.
  • On the pitch77% of available minutes.

What would actually have to be replaced. Losing the penalty taker is not the same as losing a proportional slice of Eberechi Eze’soutput.

Chances received

who supplies them
  1. Ismaila Sarr1.7 xG9 shots, 2g
  2. Tyrick Mitchell1.3 xG12 shots, 0g
  3. Daniel Muñoz1.2 xG8 shots, 1g
  4. Jean-Philippe Mateta0.8 xG8 shots, 0g
  5. Adam Wharton0.6 xG7 shots, 1g

Chances created

who they supply
  1. Jean-Philippe Mateta3.5 xG15 shots, 6g
  2. Daniel Muñoz0.8 xG6 shots, 1g
  3. Ismaila Sarr0.6 xG1 shot, 0g
  4. Marc Guehi0.4 xG2 shots, 1g
  5. Chris Richards0.4 xG6 shots, 0g

Season record

2024/25

Involvement in build-up

excludes their own shots and final passes

Eberechi Eze carries 9.1% of Crystal Palace’s build-up value.

  • Build-up per 900.296
    79% of forwards
  • Possession value per 900.641
    59% of forwards

Ranked against 104 forwards with a comparable sample. Build-up is the value of possessions a player was involved in, with their own shots and final passes removed, so it credits the work before the chance rather than the chance.

Match by match

Match log

34 appearances, oldest first

at Brentford7 shots
3 on target

v West Ham5 shots
1 on target

1g

at Chelsea3 shots
1 on target

v Leicester3 shots
0 on target

v Man Utd2 shots
1 on target

at Everton5 shots
1 on target

v Liverpool2 shots
2 on target

at Forest6 shots
2 on target

v Spurs4 shots
1 on target

at Ipswich3 shots
1 on target

v Man City2 shots
0 on target

at Brighton1 shot
0 on target

at Bournemouth4 shots
1 on target

1g

v Southampton6 shots
3 on target

v Chelsea4 shots
1 on target

at Leicester1 shot
0 on target

at West Ham2 shots
0 on target

v Brentford5 shots
1 on target

v Everton4 shots
0 on target

at Fulham4 shots
2 on target

v Villa4 shots
0 on target

v Ipswich6 shots
0 on target

at Southampton2 shots
0 on target

v Brighton2 shots
1 on target

1g

at Man City2 shots
1 on target

at Newcastle1 shot
1 on target

v Bournemouth1 shot
0 on target

1g

at Arsenal3 shots
1 on target

1g

v Forest3 shots
1 on target

2g

at Spurs4 shots
2 on target

1g

v Wolves1 shot
1 on target

3 blanksno shot
not placed

Height is shots, solid is on target, and the dashed rule is the 1.5 line. The feed cannot date an appearance with no shot in it, so 3 sits at the end, counted but unplaced.

How to read the ties. Each rate ties back to the league average: solid where the sample is settled, broken where it is still being shrunk toward the league, an open circle where there is no cohort to rank against.