Skip to content
Touchline

Search

Jump to a club, a player, or a section

Wolverhampton Wanderers

David Møller Wolfe

Defender
Non-penalty xG per 90
0.010 non-penalty goals from 3 shots
Expected assists per 90
0.112 assists, 8 key passes
Finishing
-0.07goals above what the league converts the same chances into
Build-up per 90
0.113% of Wolverhampton Wanderers’ build-up value

David Møller Wolfe ranks 269th of 398 qualified players for attacking involvement, shooting from 17.5m on average.

Against their position

119 defenders

Shooting

per 90
Goals
0.00
Non-penalty goals
0.00
xG
0.01
Non-penalty xG
0.01
Shots
0.25
npxG per shot
–not ranked
Shot distance
–not ranked
Set-piece share
–not ranked
Goals against xG
-0.1

2 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2025/26.

Creating

per 90
Assists
0.17
Expected assists
0.11
Key passes
0.68
npxG + xA
0.12
xG chain
0.15
xG build-up
0.11
Assists against xA
+0.7

On the ball

per 90

6 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2025/26.

Defending

per 90

7 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2025/26.

Discipline

per 90
Yellow cards
1season count
Red cards
0season count

3 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2025/26.

Ranked against 119 defenders with half a match a round or more, the same comparison the compare page makes. Where less is better, such as being dispossessed, the order is turned round, so a high percentile is always the good end.

This week

Next match

Shots

22 appearances
  • Over 0.52 of 229%± 6
  • Over 1.51 of 225%± 4
  • Over 2.50 of 220%± 0
  • Over 3.50 of 220%± 0

The band is one standard error, the tick the estimate. Blanks count as misses, 20 of 22.

Shooting profile

3 shots

Where they shoot

3 shots
Every shotBy zone
33% of shots, 1 shot67% of shots, 2 shots33%67%Opponent goalLeftRight
Share of shots<1%1–2%2–4%4–6%6%+

David Møller Wolfe, 2025/26, final 35m.

left
100%
Centre
0%
right
0%

share of their shooting xG

Chance profile

quality, volume and route
xG per shot
0.028
Shots per 90
0.25
Key passes per 90
0.68
Average shot distance
17.5m
From set pieces
0%

How the chances arrive

Crosses
51%
Through balls
0%
Own dribble
0%
Headed
13%

Club role

Wolverhampton Wanderers

What they are for

  • On the pitch31% of available minutes.

What would actually have to be replaced. Losing the penalty taker is not the same as losing a proportional slice of David Møller Wolfe’soutput.

Chances received

who supplies them
  1. Matt Doherty0.0 xG1 shot, 0g
  2. Mateus Mané0.0 xG1 shot, 0g

Chances created

who they supply
  1. Jhon Arias0.7 xG2 shots, 0g
  2. Rodrigo Gomes0.3 xG1 shot, 1g
  3. Jean-Ricner Bellegarde0.1 xG2 shots, 1g
  4. Jørgen Strand Larsen0.1 xG2 shots, 0g
  5. Mateus Mané0.1 xG1 shot, 0g

Season record

2025/26

Involvement in build-up

excludes their own shots and final passes

David Møller Wolfe carries 2.6% of Wolverhampton Wanderers’ build-up value.

  • Build-up per 900.110
    7% of defenders
  • Possession value per 900.152
    8% of defenders

Ranked against 119 defenders with a comparable sample. Build-up is the value of possessions a player was involved in, with their own shots and final passes removed, so it credits the work before the chance rather than the chance.

Match by match

Match log

22 appearances, oldest first

v Palace1 shot
0 on target

v Brentford2 shots
0 on target

20 blanksno shot
not placed

Height is shots, solid is on target, and the dashed rule is the 1.5 line. The feed cannot date an appearance with no shot in it, so 20 sits at the end, counted but unplaced.

How to read the ties. Each rate ties back to the league average: solid where the sample is settled, broken where it is still being shrunk toward the league, an open circle where there is no cohort to rank against.