Small sample. Only 360 minutes this season, so the rates below swing heavily on a handful of moments. Read them as description, not as form.
Non-penalty xG per 90
0.020 non-penalty goals from 1 shots
league 0.14
Expected assists per 90
0.010 assists, 1 key pass
league 0.11
Finishing
-0.08goals above what the league converts the same chances into
Build-up per 90
0.687% of Fulham’s build-up value
league 0.30
David Affengruber has not reached the 450-minute floor this season, so they are not ranked against the league yet. They shoot from 8.3m on average, with 100% of their danger coming from set pieces.
Against their position
81 defenders
Shooting
per 90
Goals
0.0038th
Non-penalty goals
0.0038th
xG
0.0240th
Non-penalty xG
0.0240th
Shots
0.2523rd
npxG per shot
–not ranked
Shot distance
–not ranked
Set-piece share
–not ranked
Goals against xG
-0.148th
2 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2026/27.
Creating
per 90
Assists
0.0039th
Expected assists
0.0135th
Key passes
0.2533rd
npxG + xA
0.0429th
xG chain
0.6888th
xG build-up
0.6892nd
Assists against xA
-0.152nd
On the ball
per 90
6 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2026/27.
Defending
per 90
7 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2026/27.
Discipline
per 90
Yellow cards
0season count
Red cards
0season count
3 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2026/27.
Ranked against 81 defenders with half a match a round or more, the same comparison the compare page makes. Where less is better, such as being dispossessed, the order is turned round, so a high percentile is always the good end.
This week
Gameweek 8
Next fixture
Gameweek 8
away toCoventry
Sat 24 Oct, 14:00 UTC
Coventry concede 17.7 shots a match and are 1.37× the league norm against defenders. A favourable draw.
Projected shots
0.33
0.25 per 90 × 1.32
Projected on target
0.00
0.00 per 90 × 0.93
Season rate times what this opponent concedes, over a full ninety minutes. Check availability.
Shots
4 appearances
Over 0.51 of 425%± 22
Over 1.50 of 40%± 0
Over 2.50 of 40%± 0
Over 3.50 of 40%± 0
The band is one standard error, the tick the estimate. Blanks count as misses, 3 of 4.
What would actually have to be replaced. Losing the penalty taker is not the same as losing a proportional slice of David Affengruber’soutput.
Chances received
who supplies them
Alex Iwobi0.1 xG1 shot, 0g
Chances created
who they supply
Joshua King0.1 xG1 shot, 0g
Season record
2026/27
Involvement in build-up
excludes their own shots and final passes
David Affengruber carries 7.2%of Fulham’s build-up value.
Build-up per 900.677
94% of defenders
Possession value per 900.677
90% of defenders
Thin sample. Only 360 minutes, so this describes a cameo. Build-up is the value of possessions a player was involved in, with their own shots and final passes removed, so it credits the work before the chance rather than the chance.
Match by match
Match log
4 appearances, oldest first
over 1.5
at Ipswich1 shot 0 on target
3 blanksno shot not placed
Height is shots, solid is on target, and the dashed rule is the 1.5 line. The feed cannot date an appearance with no shot in it, so 3 sits at the end, counted but unplaced.
How to read the ties. Each rate ties back to the league average: solid where the sample is settled, broken where it is still being shrunk toward the league, an open circle where there is no cohort to rank against. 360 minutes leaves every tie here broken.
