+0.26goals above what the league converts the same chances into
Build-up per 90
0.254% of Brighton’s build-up value
league 0.27
Danny Welbeck ranks 63rd of 397 qualified players for attacking involvement, shooting from 15.0m on average, with 23% of their danger coming from set pieces. They carry 10% of Brighton’s attacking involvement, the 2nd largest share in the squad.
Against their position
104 forwards
Shooting
per 90
Goals
0.4273rd
Non-penalty goals
0.3870th
xG
0.4474th
Non-penalty xG
0.4171st
Shots
2.4760th
npxG per shot
0.1665th
Shot distance
15.0m60th
Set-piece share
23%72nd
Goals against xG
-0.752nd
2 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2024/25.
Creating
per 90
Assists
0.1757th
Expected assists
0.0916th
Key passes
0.9639th
npxG + xA
0.4950th
xG chain
0.6561st
xG build-up
0.2568th
Assists against xA
+1.996th
On the ball
per 90
6 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2024/25.
Defending
per 90
7 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2024/25.
Discipline
per 90
Yellow cards
4season count
Red cards
0season count
3 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2024/25.
Ranked against 104 forwards with half a match a round or more, the same comparison the compare page makes. Where less is better, such as being dispossessed, the order is turned round, so a high percentile is always the good end.
This week
Gameweek 8
Next fixture
Gameweek 8
vsTottenham
Sat 24 Oct, 16:30 UTC
Tottenham concede 13.8 shots a match and are 1.18× the league norm against forwards. A favourable draw.
Projected shots
2.77
2.47 per 90 × 1.12
Projected on target
1.07
1.00 per 90 × 1.07
Season rate times what this opponent concedes, over a full ninety minutes. Check availability.
Shots
30 appearances
Over 0.525 of 3083%± 7
Over 1.517 of 3057%± 9
Over 2.59 of 3030%± 8
Over 3.55 of 3017%± 7
The band is one standard error, the tick the estimate. Blanks count as misses, 5 of 30.
PenaltiesTakes them: 1 of 7 Brighton were awarded.
When it mattered9 of 10 goals came with the game level or Brighton behind.
On the pitch63% of available minutes.
What would actually have to be replaced. Losing the penalty taker is not the same as losing a proportional slice of Danny Welbeck’soutput.
Chances received
who supplies them
Kaoru Mitoma2.0 xG7 shots, 1g
Georginio Rutter1.7 xG7 shots, 3g
Yankuba Minteh1.5 xG8 shots, 1g
Brajan Gruda0.5 xG2 shots, 0g
João Pedro0.4 xG1 shot, 0g
Chances created
who they supply
Yankuba Minteh0.9 xG4 shots, 2g
João Pedro0.2 xG3 shots, 0g
Kaoru Mitoma0.2 xG3 shots, 0g
Matt O'Riley0.2 xG3 shots, 0g
Georginio Rutter0.1 xG3 shots, 0g
Season record
2024/25
Involvement in build-up
excludes their own shots and final passes
Danny Welbeck carries 4.4%of Brighton’s build-up value.
Build-up per 900.246
67% of forwards
Possession value per 900.649
61% of forwards
Ranked against 104 forwards with a comparable sample. Build-up is the value of possessions a player was involved in, with their own shots and final passes removed, so it credits the work before the chance rather than the chance.
Match by match
Match log
30 appearances, oldest first
over 1.5
1g
at Everton2 shots 1 on target
1g
v Man Utd3 shots 2 on target
at Arsenal1 shot 0 on target
v Ipswich4 shots 1 on target
1g
v Forest3 shots 2 on target
at Chelsea3 shots 1 on target
1g
v Spurs3 shots 1 on target
1g
at Newcastle2 shots 2 on target
1g
v Wolves4 shots 1 on target
at Liverpool4 shots 1 on target
v Man City2 shots 0 on target
v Southampton2 shots 0 on target
at Leicester2 shots 1 on target
at Man Utd1 shot 0 on target
v Everton2 shots 0 on target
at Forest1 shot 1 on target
v Chelsea1 shot 0 on target
1g
v Bournemouth1 shot 1 on target
v Fulham1 shot 0 on target
1g
at Palace2 shots 2 on target
v Leicester5 shots 2 on target
1g
at Brentford2 shots 1 on target
v West Ham1 shot 0 on target
1g
at Wolves1 shot 1 on target
v Liverpool6 shots 3 on target
5 blanksno shot not placed
Height is shots, solid is on target, and the dashed rule is the 1.5 line. The feed cannot date an appearance with no shot in it, so 5 sits at the end, counted but unplaced.
How to read the ties. Each rate ties back to the league average: solid where the sample is settled, broken where it is still being shrunk toward the league, an open circle where there is no cohort to rank against.
