Skip to content
Touchline

Search

Jump to a club, a player, or a section

Daniel Muñoz

Defender30 yrs
Non-penalty xG per 90
0.110 non-penalty goals from 8 shots
Expected assists per 90
0.194 assists, 21 key passes
Finishing
-1.67goals above what the league converts the same chances into
Build-up per 90
0.234% of Crystal Palace’s build-up value

Daniel Muñoz ranks 137th of 402 qualified players for attacking involvement, shooting from 9.5m on average, with 41% of their danger coming from set pieces. They carry 4% of Crystal Palace’s attacking involvement, the 11th largest share in the squad.

Against their position

135 defenders

Shooting

per 90
Goals
0.00
Non-penalty goals
0.00
xG
0.11
Non-penalty xG
0.11
Shots
0.50
npxG per shot
–not ranked
Shot distance
–not ranked
Set-piece share
–not ranked
Goals against xG
-1.8

2 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2023/24.

Creating

per 90
Assists
0.25
Expected assists
0.19
Key passes
1.31
npxG + xA
0.30
xG chain
0.43
xG build-up
0.23
Assists against xA
+0.9

On the ball

per 90

6 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2023/24.

Defending

per 90

7 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2023/24.

Discipline

per 90
Yellow cards
4season count
Red cards
0season count

3 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2023/24.

Ranked against 135 defenders with half a match a round or more, the same comparison the compare page makes. Where less is better, such as being dispossessed, the order is turned round, so a high percentile is always the good end.

This week

Gameweek 7

Next fixture

Gameweek 7

vs Arsenal

Sun 18 Oct, 15:30 UTC

Arsenal concede 8.6 shots a match and are 0.64× the league norm against defenders. A difficult one.

Projected shots
0.32

0.50 per 90 × 0.63

Projected on target
0.00

0.00 per 90 × 0.46

Season rate times what this opponent concedes, over a full ninety minutes. Check availability.

Shots

16 appearances
  • Over 0.56 of 1638%± 12
  • Over 1.52 of 1613%± 8
  • Over 2.50 of 160%± 0
  • Over 3.50 of 160%± 0

The band is one standard error, the tick the estimate. Blanks count as misses, 10 of 16.

Shooting profile

8 shots

Where they shoot

8 shots
Opponent goalLeftRight
GoalNo goalMark area is the chance’s expected goals

Daniel Muñoz, 2023/24, 8 shots in the final 35m, 0 scored.

left
12%
Centre
75%
right
13%

share of their shooting xG

Chance profile

quality, volume and route
xG per shot
0.219
Shots per 90
0.50
Key passes per 90
1.31
Average shot distance
9.5m
From set pieces
41%

How the chances arrive

Crosses
9%
Through balls
0%
Own dribble
0%
Headed
2%

Club role

Crystal Palace

What they are for

  • On the pitch42% of available minutes.

What would actually have to be replaced. Losing the penalty taker is not the same as losing a proportional slice of Daniel Muñoz’soutput.

Chances received

who supplies them
  1. Eberechi Eze1.4 xG4 shots, 0g
  2. Tyrick Mitchell0.1 xG2 shots, 0g
  3. Jordan Ayew0.1 xG1 shot, 0g
  4. Adam Wharton0.1 xG1 shot, 0g

Chances created

who they supply
  1. Jean-Philippe Mateta1.4 xG4 shots, 2g
  2. Michael Olise0.7 xG7 shots, 2g
  3. Eberechi Eze0.6 xG2 shots, 0g
  4. Naouirou Ahamada0.1 xG2 shots, 0g
  5. Jefferson Lerma0.1 xG2 shots, 0g

Season record

2023/24

Involvement in build-up

excludes their own shots and final passes

Daniel Muñoz carries 3.8% of Crystal Palace’s build-up value.

  • Build-up per 900.226
    39% of defenders
  • Possession value per 900.433
    71% of defenders

Ranked against 135 defenders with a comparable sample. Build-up is the value of possessions a player was involved in, with their own shots and final passes removed, so it credits the work before the chance rather than the chance.

Match by match

Match log

16 appearances, oldest first

v Burnley2 shots
0 on target

v Luton1 shot
0 on target

at Forest1 shot
0 on target

at Fulham1 shot
0 on target

v Man Utd1 shot
0 on target

at Wolves2 shots
0 on target

10 blanksno shot
not placed

Height is shots, solid is on target, and the dashed rule is the 1.5 line. The feed cannot date an appearance with no shot in it, so 10 sits at the end, counted but unplaced.

How to read the ties. Each rate ties back to the league average: solid where the sample is settled, broken where it is still being shrunk toward the league, an open circle where there is no cohort to rank against.