Skip to content
Touchline

Search

Jump to a club, a player, or a section

Wolverhampton Wanderers

Craig Dawson

Defender
Non-penalty xG per 90
0.061 non-penalty goals from 16 shots
Expected assists per 90
0.051 assists, 9 key passes
Finishing
-0.29goals above what the league converts the same chances into
Build-up per 90
0.176% of Wolverhampton Wanderers’ build-up value

Craig Dawson ranks 269th of 402 qualified players for attacking involvement, shooting from 11.9m on average, with 91% of their danger coming from set pieces. They carry 3% of Wolverhampton Wanderers’ attacking involvement, the 14th largest share in the squad.

Against their position

135 defenders

Shooting

per 90
Goals
0.04
Non-penalty goals
0.04
xG
0.06
Non-penalty xG
0.06
Shots
0.65
npxG per shot
0.08
Shot distance
11.9m
Set-piece share
91%
Goals against xG
-0.4

2 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2023/24.

Creating

per 90
Assists
0.04
Expected assists
0.05
Key passes
0.37
npxG + xA
0.11
xG chain
0.18
xG build-up
0.17
Assists against xA
-0.4

On the ball

per 90

6 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2023/24.

Defending

per 90

7 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2023/24.

Discipline

per 90
Yellow cards
7season count
Red cards
0season count

3 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2023/24.

Ranked against 135 defenders with half a match a round or more, the same comparison the compare page makes. Where less is better, such as being dispossessed, the order is turned round, so a high percentile is always the good end.

This week

Next match

Shots

25 appearances
  • Over 0.512 of 2548%± 10
  • Over 1.53 of 2512%± 6
  • Over 2.51 of 254%± 4
  • Over 3.50 of 250%± 0

The band is one standard error, the tick the estimate. Blanks count as misses, 13 of 25.

Shooting profile

16 shots

Where they shoot

16 shots
Every shotBy zone
Opponent goalLeftRight
GoalNo goalMark area is the chance’s expected goals

Craig Dawson, 2023/24, 16 shots in the final 35m, 1 scored.

left
27%
Centre
57%
right
15%

share of their shooting xG

Chance profile

quality, volume and route
xG per shot
0.085
Shots per 90
0.65
Key passes per 90
0.37
Average shot distance
11.9m
From set pieces
91%

How the chances arrive

Crosses
0%
Through balls
0%
Own dribble
0%
Headed
0%

Club role

Wolverhampton Wanderers

What they are for

  • Corners and set piecesSupplies 8% of Wolverhampton Wanderers’ dead-ball danger, from 5 deliveries that became shots.
  • On the pitch65% of available minutes.

What would actually have to be replaced. Losing the penalty taker is not the same as losing a proportional slice of Craig Dawson’soutput.

Chances received

who supplies them
  1. Pedro Neto0.4 xG3 shots, 0g
  2. Matheus Cunha0.3 xG1 shot, 1g
  3. Pablo Sarabia0.3 xG5 shots, 0g
  4. Matheus Nunes0.1 xG1 shot, 0g
  5. Rayan Ait Nouri0.0 xG1 shot, 0g

Chances created

who they supply
  1. Max Kilman0.9 xG1 shot, 1g
  2. Nélson Semedo0.2 xG1 shot, 0g
  3. Mario Lemina0.1 xG3 shots, 0g
  4. Pablo Sarabia0.1 xG1 shot, 0g
  5. Matheus Cunha0.0 xG2 shots, 0g

Season record

2023/24

Involvement in build-up

excludes their own shots and final passes

Craig Dawson carries 5.8% of Wolverhampton Wanderers’ build-up value.

  • Build-up per 900.171
    21% of defenders
  • Possession value per 900.178
    16% of defenders

Ranked against 135 defenders with a comparable sample. Build-up is the value of possessions a player was involved in, with their own shots and final passes removed, so it credits the work before the chance rather than the chance.

Match by match

Match log

25 appearances, oldest first

at Man Utd1 shot
0 on target

v Brighton2 shots
1 on target

at Palace1 shot
0 on target

v Liverpool1 shot
0 on target

at Bournemouth3 shots
2 on target

v Forest1 shot
0 on target

at West Ham1 shot
0 on target

v Chelsea1 shot
0 on target

1g

v Everton1 shot
1 on target

at Brighton1 shot
0 on target

v Man Utd2 shots
1 on target

at Newcastle1 shot
0 on target

13 blanksno shot
not placed

Height is shots, solid is on target, and the dashed rule is the 1.5 line. The feed cannot date an appearance with no shot in it, so 13 sits at the end, counted but unplaced.

How to read the ties. Each rate ties back to the league average: solid where the sample is settled, broken where it is still being shrunk toward the league, an open circle where there is no cohort to rank against.