Skip to content
Touchline

Search

Jump to a club, a player, or a section

Ipswich

Cameron Burgess

Defender
Non-penalty xG per 90
0.050 non-penalty goals from 10 shots
Expected assists per 90
0.022 assists, 7 key passes
Finishing
-0.84goals above what the league converts the same chances into
Build-up per 90
0.205% of Ipswich’s build-up value

Cameron Burgess ranks 298th of 397 qualified players for attacking involvement, shooting from 9.4m on average, with 59% of their danger coming from set pieces.

Against their position

123 defenders

Shooting

per 90
Goals
0.00
Non-penalty goals
0.00
xG
0.05
Non-penalty xG
0.05
Shots
0.59
npxG per shot
0.09
Shot distance
9.4m
Set-piece share
59%
Goals against xG
-0.9

2 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2024/25.

Creating

per 90
Assists
0.12
Expected assists
0.02
Key passes
0.41
npxG + xA
0.08
xG chain
0.24
xG build-up
0.20
Assists against xA
+1.6

On the ball

per 90

6 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2024/25.

Defending

per 90

7 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2024/25.

Discipline

per 90
Yellow cards
0season count
Red cards
0season count

3 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2024/25.

Ranked against 123 defenders with half a match a round or more, the same comparison the compare page makes. Where less is better, such as being dispossessed, the order is turned round, so a high percentile is always the good end.

This week

Gameweek 8

Next fixture

Gameweek 8

vs Nottingham Forest

Fri 23 Oct, 19:00 UTC

Nottingham Forest concede 14.0 shots a match and are 1.13× the league norm against defenders. A favourable draw.

Projected shots
0.65

0.59 per 90 × 1.10

Projected on target
0.11

0.12 per 90 × 0.98

Season rate times what this opponent concedes, over a full ninety minutes. Check availability.

Shots

18 appearances
  • Over 0.57 of 1839%± 11
  • Over 1.52 of 1811%± 7
  • Over 2.51 of 186%± 5
  • Over 3.50 of 180%± 0

The band is one standard error, the tick the estimate. Blanks count as misses, 11 of 18.

Shooting profile

10 shots

Where they shoot

10 shots
Every shotBy zone
Opponent goalLeftRight
GoalNo goalMark area is the chance’s expected goals

Cameron Burgess, 2024/25, 10 shots in the final 35m, 0 scored.

left
5%
Centre
94%
right
2%

share of their shooting xG

Chance profile

quality, volume and route
xG per shot
0.093
Shots per 90
0.59
Key passes per 90
0.41
Average shot distance
9.4m
From set pieces
59%

How the chances arrive

Crosses
96%
Through balls
0%
Own dribble
0%
Headed
4%

Club role

Ipswich

What they are for

  • On the pitch45% of available minutes.

What would actually have to be replaced. Losing the penalty taker is not the same as losing a proportional slice of Cameron Burgess’output.

Chances received

who supplies them
  1. Omari Hutchinson0.5 xG2 shots, 0g
  2. Leif Davis0.2 xG2 shots, 0g
  3. Ben Johnson0.1 xG1 shot, 0g
  4. Kalvin Phillips0.1 xG1 shot, 0g
  5. Jack Taylor0.1 xG2 shots, 0g

Chances created

who they supply
  1. Conor Chaplin0.1 xG1 shot, 1g
  2. Julio Enciso0.1 xG2 shots, 1g
  3. Jaden Philogene-Bidace0.1 xG1 shot, 0g
  4. Jack Taylor0.1 xG1 shot, 0g
  5. Leif Davis0.0 xG1 shot, 0g

Season record

2024/25

Involvement in build-up

excludes their own shots and final passes

Cameron Burgess carries 4.9% of Ipswich’s build-up value.

  • Build-up per 900.201
    20% of defenders
  • Possession value per 900.241
    25% of defenders

Ranked against 123 defenders with a comparable sample. Build-up is the value of possessions a player was involved in, with their own shots and final passes removed, so it credits the work before the chance rather than the chance.

Match by match

Match log

18 appearances, oldest first

v Everton2 shots
0 on target

at Brentford1 shot
1 on target

at Spurs1 shot
0 on target

at Forest3 shots
0 on target

v Bournemouth1 shot
0 on target

v Man City1 shot
0 on target

v Brentford1 shot
1 on target

11 blanksno shot
not placed

Height is shots, solid is on target, and the dashed rule is the 1.5 line. The feed cannot date an appearance with no shot in it, so 11 sits at the end, counted but unplaced.

How to read the ties. Each rate ties back to the league average: solid where the sample is settled, broken where it is still being shrunk toward the league, an open circle where there is no cohort to rank against.