+0.29goals above what the league converts the same chances into
Build-up per 90
0.051% of West Ham’s build-up value
league 0.24
Callum Wilson ranks 18th of 398 qualified players for attacking involvement, shooting from 12.0m on average, with 28% of their danger coming from set pieces. They carry 9% of West Ham’s attacking involvement, the 3rd largest share in the squad.
Against their position
109 forwards
Shooting
per 90
Goals
0.5189th
Non-penalty goals
0.5192nd
xG
0.5687th
Non-penalty xG
0.5690th
Shots
2.7880th
npxG per shot
0.2085th
Shot distance
12.0m92nd
Set-piece share
28%72nd
Goals against xG
-0.659th
2 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2025/26.
Creating
per 90
Assists
0.0743rd
Expected assists
0.0823rd
Key passes
0.5916th
npxG + xA
0.6386th
xG chain
0.5148th
xG build-up
0.052nd
Assists against xA
-0.067th
On the ball
per 90
6 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2025/26.
Defending
per 90
Recoveries
1.9735th
Defensive contribution
2.996th
7 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2025/26.
Discipline
per 90
Yellow cards
1season count
Red cards
0season count
3 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2025/26.
Ranked against 109 forwards with half a match a round or more, the same comparison the compare page makes. Where less is better, such as being dispossessed, the order is turned round, so a high percentile is always the good end. Recoveries and defensive contribution come from the FPL feed and are ranked in its own positions.
This week
Gameweek 8
Next fixture
Gameweek 8
away toHull
Sun 25 Oct, 14:00 UTC
No shot record for Hull in this season, so no opponent adjustment is possible. Newly promoted sides have no Premier League history to measure.
Season rate times what this opponent concedes, over a full ninety minutes. Check availability.
Shots
32 appearances
Over 0.522 of 3269%± 8
Over 1.510 of 3231%± 8
Over 2.55 of 3216%± 6
Over 3.51 of 323%± 3
The band is one standard error, the tick the estimate. Blanks count as misses, 10 of 32.
When it mattered4 of 7 goals came with the game level or West Ham behind.
On the pitch36% of available minutes.
What would actually have to be replaced. Losing the penalty taker is not the same as losing a proportional slice of Callum Wilson’soutput.
Chances received
who supplies them
Jarrod Bowen1.3 xG4 shots, 1g
El Hadji Malick Diouf1.0 xG3 shots, 1g
Crysencio Summerville0.8 xG3 shots, 1g
Oliver Scarles0.7 xG2 shots, 0g
Mateus Fernandes0.3 xG4 shots, 0g
Chances created
who they supply
Valentín Castellanos0.5 xG1 shot, 0g
Crysencio Summerville0.2 xG2 shots, 0g
Jarrod Bowen0.1 xG2 shots, 1g
Kyle Walker-Peters0.1 xG1 shot, 0g
Soungoutou Magassa0.1 xG1 shot, 0g
Season record
2025/26
Involvement in build-up
excludes their own shots and final passes
Callum Wilson carries 1.2%of West Ham’s build-up value.
Build-up per 900.047
2% of forwards
Possession value per 900.505
48% of forwards
Ranked against 109 forwards with a comparable sample. Build-up is the value of possessions a player was involved in, with their own shots and final passes removed, so it credits the work before the chance rather than the chance.
Match by match
Match log
32 appearances, oldest first
over 1.5
at Sunderland1 shot 0 on target
v Chelsea1 shot 0 on target
1g
at Forest4 shots 4 on target
at Leeds1 shot 1 on target
v Newcastle1 shot 1 on target
1g
v Burnley2 shots 1 on target
2g
at Bournemouth3 shots 2 on target
v Liverpool1 shot 0 on target
at Brighton1 shot 0 on target
at Man City1 shot 0 on target
v Fulham3 shots 0 on target
v Brighton2 shots 0 on target
at Wolves1 shot 0 on target
1g
at Spurs2 shots 1 on target
v Sunderland1 shot 0 on target
v Man Utd2 shots 1 on target
v Bournemouth3 shots 1 on target
at Fulham2 shots 0 on target
1g
v Everton1 shot 1 on target
v Arsenal1 shot 0 on target
at Newcastle1 shot 1 on target
1g
v Leeds3 shots 2 on target
10 blanksno shot not placed
Height is shots, solid is on target, and the dashed rule is the 1.5 line. The feed cannot date an appearance with no shot in it, so 10 sits at the end, counted but unplaced.
How to read the ties. Each rate ties back to the league average: solid where the sample is settled, broken where it is still being shrunk toward the league, an open circle where there is no cohort to rank against.
