-0.29goals above what the league converts the same chances into
Build-up per 90
0.102% of Crystal Palace’s build-up value
league 0.24
Brennan Johnson ranks 188th of 398 qualified players for attacking involvement, shooting from 18.1m on average. They carry 4% of Crystal Palace’s attacking involvement, the 11th largest share in the squad.
Against their position
109 forwards
Shooting
per 90
Goals
0.1120th
Non-penalty goals
0.1123rd
xG
0.1413th
Non-penalty xG
0.1416th
Shots
1.217th
npxG per shot
0.1135th
Shot distance
18.1m28th
Set-piece share
6%16th
Goals against xG
-0.660th
2 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2025/26.
Creating
per 90
Assists
0.0528th
Expected assists
0.0719th
Key passes
1.0044th
npxG + xA
0.204th
xG chain
0.288th
xG build-up
0.1024th
Assists against xA
-0.356th
On the ball
per 90
6 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2025/26.
Defending
per 90
Recoveries
2.896th
Defensive contribution
6.3723rd
7 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2025/26.
Discipline
per 90
Yellow cards
6season count
Red cards
0season count
3 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2025/26.
Ranked against 109 forwards with half a match a round or more, the same comparison the compare page makes. Where less is better, such as being dispossessed, the order is turned round, so a high percentile is always the good end. Recoveries and defensive contribution come from the FPL feed and are ranked in its own positions.
This week
Gameweek 8
Next fixture
Gameweek 8
away toArsenal
Sat 24 Oct, 14:00 UTC
Arsenal concede 8.3 shots a match and are 0.70× the league norm against forwards. A difficult one.
Projected shots
0.83
1.21 per 90 × 0.68
Projected on target
0.15
0.26 per 90 × 0.57
Season rate times what this opponent concedes, over a full ninety minutes. Check availability.
Shots
34 appearances
Over 0.514 of 3441%± 8
Over 1.58 of 3424%± 7
Over 2.51 of 343%± 3
Over 3.50 of 340%± 0
The band is one standard error, the tick the estimate. Blanks count as misses, 20 of 34.
GoalNo goalMark area is the chance’s expected goals
Brennan Johnson, 2025/26, 23 shots in the final 35m, 2 scored.
left
42%
Centre
43%
right
14%
share of their shooting xG
Chance profile
quality, volume and route
xG per shot
0.113
Shots per 90
1.21
Key passes per 90
1.00
Average shot distance
18.1m
From set pieces
6%
How the chances arrive
Crosses
21%
Through balls
37%
Own dribble
0%
Headed
22%
Club role
Crystal Palace
What they are for
On the pitch50% of available minutes.
What would actually have to be replaced. Losing the penalty taker is not the same as losing a proportional slice of Brennan Johnson’soutput.
Chances received
who supplies them
Pape Sarr0.5 xG1 shot, 1g
Adam Wharton0.4 xG2 shots, 0g
Richarlison0.4 xG1 shot, 1g
Jefferson Lerma0.4 xG1 shot, 0g
Yeremi Pino0.2 xG4 shots, 0g
Chances created
who they supply
Richarlison0.4 xG3 shots, 0g
Chris Richards0.2 xG3 shots, 0g
Jean-Philippe Mateta0.1 xG1 shot, 0g
Maxence Lacroix0.1 xG3 shots, 1g
Yeremi Pino0.1 xG2 shots, 0g
Season record
2025/26
Involvement in build-up
excludes their own shots and final passes
Brennan Johnson carries 2.1%of Crystal Palace’s build-up value.
Build-up per 900.102
24% of forwards
Possession value per 900.276
7% of forwards
Ranked against 109 forwards with a comparable sample. Build-up is the value of possessions a player was involved in, with their own shots and final passes removed, so it credits the work before the chance rather than the chance.
Match by match
Match log
34 appearances, oldest first
over 1.5
1g
v Burnley2 shots 1 on target
1g
at Man City2 shots 1 on target
v Villa1 shot 0 on target
v Liverpool1 shot 0 on target
at Newcastle2 shots 1 on target
v Villa3 shots 2 on target
v Chelsea1 shot 0 on target
at Forest2 shots 0 on target
v Burnley1 shot 0 on target
v Wolves1 shot 0 on target
v Leeds1 shot 0 on target
v West Ham2 shots 0 on target
at Liverpool2 shots 0 on target
at Bournemouth2 shots 0 on target
20 blanksno shot not placed
Height is shots, solid is on target, and the dashed rule is the 1.5 line. The feed cannot date an appearance with no shot in it, so 20 sits at the end, counted but unplaced.
How to read the ties. Each rate ties back to the league average: solid where the sample is settled, broken where it is still being shrunk toward the league, an open circle where there is no cohort to rank against.