-0.32goals above what the league converts the same chances into
Build-up per 90
0.092% of Ipswich’s build-up value
league 0.27
Ben Johnson ranks 156th of 397 qualified players for attacking involvement, shooting from 13.2m on average. They carry 5% of Ipswich’s attacking involvement, the 8th largest share in the squad.
Unavailable. Has joined Stoke City on loan for the rest of the season. The rates below describe what he did, not what he is about to do. Club status as of 17 Oct 2026.
Against their position
137 midfielders
Shooting
per 90
Goals
0.0749th
Non-penalty goals
0.0749th
xG
0.1057th
Non-penalty xG
0.1058th
Shots
0.4715th
npxG per shot
–not ranked
Shot distance
–not ranked
Set-piece share
–not ranked
Goals against xG
-0.533rd
2 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2024/25.
Creating
per 90
Assists
0.1467th
Expected assists
0.1565th
Key passes
0.7539th
npxG + xA
0.2560th
xG chain
0.2916th
xG build-up
0.095th
Assists against xA
-0.257th
On the ball
per 90
6 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2024/25.
Defending
per 90
7 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2024/25.
Discipline
per 90
Yellow cards
3season count
Red cards
1season count
3 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2024/25.
Ranked against 137 midfielders with half a match a round or more, the same comparison the compare page makes. Where less is better, such as being dispossessed, the order is turned round, so a high percentile is always the good end.
This week
Gameweek 8
Next fixture
Gameweek 8
vsNottingham Forest
Fri 23 Oct, 19:00 UTC
Nottingham Forest concede 14.0 shots a match and are 1.01× the league norm against midfielders. Roughly an average matchup.
Projected shots
0.49
0.47 per 90 × 1.04
Projected on target
0.20
0.20 per 90 × 0.98
Season rate times what this opponent concedes, over a full ninety minutes. Check availability.
Shots
23 appearances
Over 0.56 of 2326%± 9
Over 1.51 of 234%± 4
Over 2.50 of 230%± 0
Over 3.50 of 230%± 0
The band is one standard error, the tick the estimate. Blanks count as misses, 17 of 23.
GoalNo goalMark area is the chance’s expected goals
Ben Johnson, 2024/25, 7 shots in the final 35m, 1 scored.
left
0%
Centre
46%
right
54%
share of their shooting xG
Chance profile
quality, volume and route
xG per shot
0.209
Shots per 90
0.47
Key passes per 90
0.75
Average shot distance
13.2m
From set pieces
0%
How the chances arrive
Crosses
25%
Through balls
42%
Own dribble
0%
Headed
66%
Club role
Ipswich
What they are for
Corners and set piecesSupplies 8% of Ipswich’s dead-ball danger, from 5 deliveries that became shots.
On the pitch39% of available minutes.
What would actually have to be replaced. Losing the penalty taker is not the same as losing a proportional slice of Ben Johnson’soutput.
Chances received
who supplies them
Julio Enciso0.6 xG2 shots, 1g
Leif Davis0.4 xG2 shots, 0g
Nathan Broadhead0.4 xG1 shot, 0g
Omari Hutchinson0.1 xG1 shot, 0g
Sam Morsy0.0 xG1 shot, 0g
Chances created
who they supply
Julio Enciso0.6 xG1 shot, 1g
Sammie Szmodics0.5 xG1 shot, 1g
Dara O'Shea0.4 xG3 shots, 0g
George Hirst0.3 xG1 shot, 0g
Cameron Burgess0.1 xG1 shot, 0g
Season record
2024/25
Involvement in build-up
excludes their own shots and final passes
Ben Johnson carries 1.8%of Ipswich’s build-up value.
Build-up per 900.088
4% of midfielders
Possession value per 900.285
16% of midfielders
Ranked against 137 midfielders with a comparable sample. Build-up is the value of possessions a player was involved in, with their own shots and final passes removed, so it credits the work before the chance rather than the chance.
Match by match
Match log
23 appearances, oldest first
over 1.5
v Leicester1 shot 1 on target
at Fulham1 shot 0 on target
v Man City1 shot 1 on target
at Palace1 shot 0 on target
at Bournemouth2 shots 0 on target
1g
at Chelsea1 shot 1 on target
17 blanksno shot not placed
Height is shots, solid is on target, and the dashed rule is the 1.5 line. The feed cannot date an appearance with no shot in it, so 17 sits at the end, counted but unplaced.
How to read the ties. Each rate ties back to the league average: solid where the sample is settled, broken where it is still being shrunk toward the league, an open circle where there is no cohort to rank against.