Skip to content
Touchline

Search

Jump to a club, a player, or a section

Bournemouth

António Silva

Centre-back22 yrs
Non-penalty xG per 90
0.270 non-penalty goals from 6 shots
Expected assists per 90
0.000 assists, 0 key passes
Finishing
-1.46goals above what the league converts the same chances into
Build-up per 90
0.137% of Bournemouth’s build-up value

António Silva ranks 53rd of 138 qualified players for attacking involvement, shooting from 6.4m on average, with 99% of their danger coming from set pieces. They carry 8% of Bournemouth’s attacking involvement, the 5th largest share in the squad.

Against their position

81 defenders

Average match rating6.81

Shooting

per 90
Goals
0.00
Non-penalty goals
0.00
xG
0.27
Non-penalty xG
0.27
Shots
1.00
Shots on target
0.33
Shot accuracy
–not ranked
npxG per shot
–not ranked
Shot distance
–not ranked
Set-piece share
–not ranked
Goals against xG
-1.6

Creating

per 90
Assists
0.00
Expected assists
0.00
Key passes
0.00
npxG + xA
0.27
xG chain
0.13
xG build-up
0.13
Assists against xA
0.0

On the ball

per 90
Touches
58.00
Passes
44.33
Pass completion
88%
Take-ons attempted
0.00
Take-on success
–not ranked
Dispossessed
0.00

Defending

per 90
Tackles
1.67
Tackles won
–not ranked
Interceptions
0.67
Clearances
7.67
Aerials won
4.00
Aerial success
67%
Dribbled past
0.67

Discipline

per 90
Fouls committed
0.67
Caught offside
0.00
Errors
0season count
Yellow cards
2season count
Red cards
0season count

Ranked against 81 defenders with half a match a round or more, the same comparison the compare page makes. Where less is better, such as being dispossessed, the order is turned round, so a high percentile is always the good end.

This week

Gameweek 7

Next fixture

Gameweek 7

vs Sunderland

Sun 18 Oct, 13:00 UTC

Sunderland concede 12.2 shots a match and are 0.93× the league norm against centre-backs (5 shots so far). A difficult one.

Projected shots
0.91

1.00 per 90 × 0.91

Projected on target
0.26

0.33 per 90 × 0.77

Season rate times what this opponent concedes, over a full ninety minutes. Check availability.

Shots

6 appearances
  • Over 0.54 of 667%± 19
  • Over 1.52 of 633%± 19
  • Over 2.50 of 60%± 0
  • Over 3.50 of 60%± 0

The band is one standard error, the tick the estimate. Blanks count as misses, 2 of 6.

Shooting profile

6 shots

Where they shoot

6 shots
Every shotBy zone
50% of shots, 3 shots33% of shots, 2 shots17% of shots, 1 shot50%33%17%Opponent goalLeftRight
Share of shots<1%1–2%2–4%4–6%6%+

António Silva, 2026/27, final 35m.

left
0%
Centre
99%
right
1%

share of their shooting xG

Chance profile

quality, volume and route
xG per shot
0.271
Shots per 90
1.00
Key passes per 90
0.00
Average shot distance
6.4m
From set pieces
99%

How the chances arrive

Crosses
0%
Through balls
0%
Own dribble
0%
Headed
100%

Club role

Bournemouth

What they are for

  • On the pitch100% of available minutes.

What would actually have to be replaced. Losing the penalty taker is not the same as losing a proportional slice of António Silva’soutput.

Chances received

who supplies them
  1. Marcus Tavernier1.0 xG2 shots, 0g
  2. Ryan Christie0.3 xG1 shot, 0g
  3. Alex Scott0.1 xG1 shot, 0g
  4. Adrien Truffert0.1 xG1 shot, 0g
  5. James Hill0.0 xG1 shot, 0g

Chances created

who they supply
UncollectedAntónio Silva did not set up a recorded shot this season.

Season record

2026/27

Involvement in build-up

excludes their own shots and final passes

António Silva carries 6.6% of Bournemouth’s build-up value.

  • Build-up per 900.129
    12% of defenders
  • Possession value per 900.132
    6% of defenders

Ranked against 52 defenders with a comparable sample. Build-up is the value of possessions a player was involved in, with their own shots and final passes removed, so it credits the work before the chance rather than the chance.

Match by match

Match log

6 appearances, oldest first

v Everton1 shot
0 on target

at Newcastle1 shot
1 on target

v Brentford2 shots
0 on target

at Chelsea2 shots
1 on target

2 blanksno shot
not placed

Height is shots, solid is on target, and the dashed rule is the 1.5 line. The feed cannot date an appearance with no shot in it, so 2 sits at the end, counted but unplaced.

How to read the ties. Each rate ties back to the league average: solid where the sample is settled, broken where it is still being shrunk toward the league, an open circle where there is no cohort to rank against.