Skip to content
Touchline

Search

Jump to a club, a player, or a section

Fulham

Antonee Robinson

Left-back29 yrsPenalties 2nd
Non-penalty xG per 90
0.060 non-penalty goals from 4 shots
Expected assists per 90
0.070 assists, 8 key passes
Finishing
-0.29goals above what the league converts the same chances into
Build-up per 90
0.518% of Fulham’s build-up value

Antonee Robinson ranks 87th of 138 qualified players for attacking involvement, shooting from 19.1m on average. They carry 2% of Fulham’s attacking involvement, the 9th largest share in the squad.

Against their position

81 defenders

Average match rating6.45

Shooting

per 90
Goals
0.00
Non-penalty goals
0.00
xG
0.06
Non-penalty xG
0.06
Shots
0.68
Shots on target
0.00
Shot accuracy
–not ranked
npxG per shot
–not ranked
Shot distance
–not ranked
Set-piece share
–not ranked
Goals against xG
-0.3

Creating

per 90
Assists
0.00
Expected assists
0.07
Key passes
1.37
npxG + xA
0.13
xG chain
0.61
xG build-up
0.51
Assists against xA
-0.4

On the ball

per 90
Touches
71.67
Passes
49.67
Pass completion
80%
Take-ons attempted
1.67
Take-on success
–not ranked
Dispossessed
0.33

Defending

per 90
Tackles
4.33
Tackles won
62%not ranked
Interceptions
0.33
Clearances
1.67
Aerials won
0.00
Aerial success
–not ranked
Dribbled past
1.67

Discipline

per 90
Fouls committed
0.00
Caught offside
0.00
Errors
0season count
Yellow cards
0season count
Red cards
0season count

Ranked against 81 defenders with half a match a round or more, the same comparison the compare page makes. Where less is better, such as being dispossessed, the order is turned round, so a high percentile is always the good end.

This week

Gameweek 8

Next fixture

Gameweek 8

away to Coventry

Sat 24 Oct, 14:00 UTC

Coventry concede 17.7 shots a match and are 1.10× the league norm against full-backs (11 shots so far). A favourable draw.

Projected shots
0.81

0.68 per 90 × 1.19

Projected on target
0.00

0.00 per 90 × 0.93

Season rate times what this opponent concedes, over a full ninety minutes. Check availability.

Shots

6 appearances
  • Over 0.53 of 650%± 20
  • Over 1.51 of 617%± 15
  • Over 2.50 of 60%± 0
  • Over 3.50 of 60%± 0

The band is one standard error, the tick the estimate. Blanks count as misses, 3 of 6.

Shooting profile

4 shots

Where they shoot

4 shots
Every shotBy zone
25% of shots, 1 shot25% of shots, 1 shot25% of shots, 1 shot25% of shots, 1 shot25%25%25%25%Opponent goalLeftRight
Share of shots<1%1–2%2–4%4–6%6%+

Antonee Robinson, 2026/27, final 35m.

left
100%
Centre
0%
right
0%

share of their shooting xG

Chance profile

quality, volume and route
xG per shot
0.082
Shots per 90
0.68
Key passes per 90
1.37
Average shot distance
19.1m
From set pieces
0%

How the chances arrive

Crosses
0%
Through balls
76%
Own dribble
0%
Headed
14%

Club role

Fulham

What they are for

  • On the pitch98% of available minutes.

What would actually have to be replaced. Losing the penalty taker is not the same as losing a proportional slice of Antonee Robinson’soutput.

Chances received

who supplies them
  1. Jorge Cuenca0.2 xG1 shot, 0g
  2. Shea Charles0.1 xG2 shots, 0g
  3. Oscar Bobb0.0 xG1 shot, 0g

Chances created

who they supply
  1. Joshua King0.2 xG3 shots, 0g
  2. Gonzalo García0.2 xG3 shots, 0g
  3. Alex Iwobi0.1 xG1 shot, 0g

Season record

2026/27

Involvement in build-up

excludes their own shots and final passes

Antonee Robinson carries 7.9% of Fulham’s build-up value.

  • Build-up per 900.509
    88% of defenders
  • Possession value per 900.608
    85% of defenders

Ranked against 52 defenders with a comparable sample. Build-up is the value of possessions a player was involved in, with their own shots and final passes removed, so it credits the work before the chance rather than the chance.

Match by match

Match log

6 appearances, oldest first

v Chelsea1 shot
0 on target

v Palace2 shots
0 on target

at Liverpool1 shot
0 on target

3 blanksno shot
not placed

Height is shots, solid is on target, and the dashed rule is the 1.5 line. The feed cannot date an appearance with no shot in it, so 3 sits at the end, counted but unplaced.

How to read the ties. Each rate ties back to the league average: solid where the sample is settled, broken where it is still being shrunk toward the league, an open circle where there is no cohort to rank against.