Skip to content
Touchline

Search

Jump to a club, a player, or a section

Andros Townsend

Forward
Non-penalty xG per 90
0.111 non-penalty goals from 20 shots
Expected assists per 90
0.113 assists, 18 key passes
Finishing
-0.36goals above what the league converts the same chances into
Build-up per 90
0.092% of Luton’s build-up value

Andros Townsend ranks 175th of 402 qualified players for attacking involvement, shooting from 23.0m on average, with 60% of their danger coming from set pieces. They carry 4% of Luton’s attacking involvement, the 11th largest share in the squad.

Against their position

107 forwards

Shooting

per 90
Goals
0.07
Non-penalty goals
0.07
xG
0.11
Non-penalty xG
0.11
Shots
1.49
npxG per shot
0.07
Shot distance
23.0m
Set-piece share
60%
Goals against xG
-0.4

2 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2023/24.

Creating

per 90
Assists
0.22
Expected assists
0.11
Key passes
1.34
npxG + xA
0.21
xG chain
0.21
xG build-up
0.09
Assists against xA
+1.5

On the ball

per 90

6 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2023/24.

Defending

per 90

7 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2023/24.

Discipline

per 90
Yellow cards
1season count
Red cards
0season count

3 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2023/24.

Ranked against 107 forwards with half a match a round or more, the same comparison the compare page makes. Where less is better, such as being dispossessed, the order is turned round, so a high percentile is always the good end.

This week

Next match

Shots

27 appearances
  • Over 0.512 of 2744%± 10
  • Over 1.54 of 2715%± 7
  • Over 2.54 of 2715%± 7
  • Over 3.50 of 270%± 0

The band is one standard error, the tick the estimate. Blanks count as misses, 15 of 27.

Shooting profile

20 shots

Where they shoot

20 shots
Opponent goalLeftRight
GoalNo goalMark area is the chance’s expected goals

Andros Townsend, 2023/24, 20 shots in the final 35m, 1 scored.

left
9%
Centre
63%
right
28%

share of their shooting xG

Chance profile

quality, volume and route
xG per shot
0.071
Shots per 90
1.49
Key passes per 90
1.34
Average shot distance
23.0m
From set pieces
60%

How the chances arrive

Crosses
0%
Through balls
0%
Own dribble
8%
Headed
9%

Club role

Luton

What they are for

  • On the pitch35% of available minutes.

What would actually have to be replaced. Losing the penalty taker is not the same as losing a proportional slice of Andros Townsend’soutput.

Chances received

who supplies them
  1. Ross Barkley0.8 xG6 shots, 1g
  2. Carlton Morris0.1 xG3 shots, 0g
  3. Chiedozie Ogbene0.1 xG1 shot, 0g
  4. Elijah Adebayo0.1 xG2 shots, 0g
  5. Gabriel Osho0.0 xG1 shot, 0g

Chances created

who they supply
  1. Elijah Adebayo0.6 xG2 shots, 1g
  2. Chiedozie Ogbene0.2 xG3 shots, 0g
  3. Ross Barkley0.2 xG5 shots, 1g
  4. Teden Mengi0.1 xG1 shot, 0g
  5. Jacob Brown0.1 xG2 shots, 0g

Season record

2023/24

Involvement in build-up

excludes their own shots and final passes

Andros Townsend carries 1.9% of Luton’s build-up value.

  • Build-up per 900.089
    12% of forwards
  • Possession value per 900.208
    0% of forwards

Ranked against 107 forwards with a comparable sample. Build-up is the value of possessions a player was involved in, with their own shots and final passes removed, so it credits the work before the chance rather than the chance.

Match by match

Match log

27 appearances, oldest first

at Man Utd3 shots
1 on target

v Arsenal1 shot
0 on target

v Man City1 shot
1 on target

1g

v Newcastle3 shots
2 on target

at Sheffield Utd3 shots
1 on target

v Sheffield Utd1 shot
1 on target

v Man Utd1 shot
0 on target

at Liverpool3 shots
0 on target

v Villa1 shot
0 on target

v Forest1 shot
1 on target

at Spurs1 shot
0 on target

v Everton1 shot
0 on target

15 blanksno shot
not placed

Height is shots, solid is on target, and the dashed rule is the 1.5 line. The feed cannot date an appearance with no shot in it, so 15 sits at the end, counted but unplaced.

How to read the ties. Each rate ties back to the league average: solid where the sample is settled, broken where it is still being shrunk toward the league, an open circle where there is no cohort to rank against.