Skip to content
Touchline

Search

Jump to a club, a player, or a section

André

Midfielder
Non-penalty xG per 90
0.010 non-penalty goals from 10 shots
Expected assists per 90
0.030 assists, 18 key passes
Finishing
-0.27goals above what the league converts the same chances into
Build-up per 90
0.3110% of Wolverhampton Wanderers’ build-up value

André ranks 342nd of 397 qualified players for attacking involvement, shooting from 24.8m on average, with 45% of their danger coming from set pieces. They carry 5% of Wolverhampton Wanderers’ attacking involvement, the 7th largest share in the squad.

Against their position

137 midfielders

Shooting

per 90
Goals
0.00
Non-penalty goals
0.00
xG
0.01
Non-penalty xG
0.01
Shots
0.35
npxG per shot
0.03
Shot distance
24.8m
Set-piece share
45%
Goals against xG
-0.3

2 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2024/25.

Creating

per 90
Assists
0.00
Expected assists
0.03
Key passes
0.64
npxG + xA
0.04
xG chain
0.34
xG build-up
0.31
Assists against xA
-0.8

On the ball

per 90

6 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2024/25.

Defending

per 90

7 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2024/25.

Discipline

per 90
Yellow cards
7season count
Red cards
0season count

3 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2024/25.

Ranked against 137 midfielders with half a match a round or more, the same comparison the compare page makes. Where less is better, such as being dispossessed, the order is turned round, so a high percentile is always the good end.

This week

Next match

Shots

33 appearances
  • Over 0.59 of 3327%± 8
  • Over 1.51 of 333%± 3
  • Over 2.50 of 330%± 0
  • Over 3.50 of 330%± 0

The band is one standard error, the tick the estimate. Blanks count as misses, 24 of 33.

Shooting profile

10 shots

Where they shoot

10 shots
10% of shots, 1 shot10% of shots, 1 shot10% of shots, 1 shot10% of shots, 1 shot10% of shots, 1 shot20% of shots, 2 shots10% of shots, 1 shot10% of shots, 1 shot10%10%10%10%10%20%10%10%Opponent goalLeftRight
Share of shots<1%1–2%2–4%4–6%6%+

André, 2024/25, final 35m. A further 10% of their shots came from outside this window.

left
46%
Centre
47%
right
7%

share of their shooting xG

Chance profile

quality, volume and route
xG per shot
0.030
Shots per 90
0.35
Key passes per 90
0.64
Average shot distance
24.8m
From set pieces
45%

How the chances arrive

Crosses
0%
Through balls
0%
Own dribble
0%
Headed
0%

Club role

Wolverhampton Wanderers

What they are for

  • On the pitch74% of available minutes.

What would actually have to be replaced. Losing the penalty taker is not the same as losing a proportional slice of André’soutput.

Chances received

who supplies them
  1. Gonçalo Guedes0.0 xG1 shot, 0g
  2. Jean-Ricner Bellegarde0.0 xG1 shot, 0g

Chances created

who they supply
  1. Gonçalo Guedes0.3 xG1 shot, 0g
  2. Matheus Cunha0.1 xG6 shots, 0g
  3. Jean-Ricner Bellegarde0.1 xG1 shot, 0g
  4. João Gomes0.1 xG3 shots, 0g
  5. Rayan Ait Nouri0.1 xG1 shot, 0g

Season record

2024/25

Involvement in build-up

excludes their own shots and final passes

André carries 10.1% of Wolverhampton Wanderers’ build-up value.

  • Build-up per 900.314
    66% of midfielders
  • Possession value per 900.337
    32% of midfielders

Ranked against 137 midfielders with a comparable sample. Build-up is the value of possessions a player was involved in, with their own shots and final passes removed, so it credits the work before the chance rather than the chance.

Match by match

Match log

33 appearances, oldest first

at Villa1 shot
0 on target

at Brentford1 shot
1 on target

at Liverpool1 shot
0 on target

v Fulham1 shot
0 on target

v Everton2 shots
0 on target

v West Ham1 shot
0 on target

v Leicester1 shot
0 on target

at Man City1 shot
0 on target

v Brentford1 shot
0 on target

24 blanksno shot
not placed

Height is shots, solid is on target, and the dashed rule is the 1.5 line. The feed cannot date an appearance with no shot in it, so 24 sits at the end, counted but unplaced.

How to read the ties. Each rate ties back to the league average: solid where the sample is settled, broken where it is still being shrunk toward the league, an open circle where there is no cohort to rank against.