Skip to content
Touchline

Search

Jump to a club, a player, or a section

André

Midfielder
Non-penalty xG per 90
0.021 non-penalty goals from 15 shots
Expected assists per 90
0.040 assists, 18 key passes
Finishing
+0.54goals above what the league converts the same chances into
Build-up per 90
0.1811% of Wolverhampton Wanderers’ build-up value

André ranks 334th of 398 qualified players for attacking involvement, shooting from 24.6m on average, with 59% of their danger coming from set pieces. They carry 6% of Wolverhampton Wanderers’ attacking involvement, the 7th largest share in the squad.

Against their position

142 midfielders

Shooting

per 90
Goals
0.03
Non-penalty goals
0.03
xG
0.02
Non-penalty xG
0.02
Shots
0.49
npxG per shot
0.03
Shot distance
24.6m
Set-piece share
59%
Goals against xG
+0.5

2 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2025/26.

Creating

per 90
Assists
0.00
Expected assists
0.04
Key passes
0.59
npxG + xA
0.06
xG chain
0.20
xG build-up
0.18
Assists against xA
-1.2

On the ball

per 90

6 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2025/26.

Defending

per 90

7 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2025/26.

Discipline

per 90
Yellow cards
12season count
Red cards
0season count

3 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2025/26.

Ranked against 142 midfielders with half a match a round or more, the same comparison the compare page makes. Where less is better, such as being dispossessed, the order is turned round, so a high percentile is always the good end.

This week

Next match

Shots

35 appearances
  • Over 0.512 of 3534%± 8
  • Over 1.53 of 359%± 5
  • Over 2.50 of 350%± 0
  • Over 3.50 of 350%± 0

The band is one standard error, the tick the estimate. Blanks count as misses, 23 of 35.

Shooting profile

15 shots

Where they shoot

15 shots
Opponent goalLeftRight
GoalNo goalMark area is the chance’s expected goals

André, 2025/26, 15 shots in the final 35m, 1 scored.

left
28%
Centre
36%
right
36%

share of their shooting xG

Chance profile

quality, volume and route
xG per shot
0.034
Shots per 90
0.49
Key passes per 90
0.59
Average shot distance
24.6m
From set pieces
59%

How the chances arrive

Crosses
0%
Through balls
0%
Own dribble
0%
Headed
0%

Club role

Wolverhampton Wanderers

What they are for

  • Corners and set piecesSupplies 6% of Wolverhampton Wanderers’ dead-ball danger, from 7 deliveries that became shots.
  • On the pitch81% of available minutes.

What would actually have to be replaced. Losing the penalty taker is not the same as losing a proportional slice of André’soutput.

Chances received

who supplies them
  1. Jackson Tchatchoua0.1 xG1 shot, 1g
  2. Santiago Bueno0.0 xG1 shot, 0g
  3. Hee-Chan Hwang0.0 xG1 shot, 0g
  4. João Gomes0.0 xG1 shot, 0g
  5. Ki-Jana Hoever0.0 xG1 shot, 0g

Chances created

who they supply
  1. Tolu Arokodare0.4 xG1 shot, 0g
  2. Yerson Mosquera0.2 xG3 shots, 0g
  3. Emmanuel Agbadou0.1 xG3 shots, 0g
  4. Marshall Munetsi0.1 xG1 shot, 0g
  5. João Gomes0.1 xG2 shots, 0g

Season record

2025/26

Involvement in build-up

excludes their own shots and final passes

André carries 10.9% of Wolverhampton Wanderers’ build-up value.

  • Build-up per 900.180
    22% of midfielders
  • Possession value per 900.203
    6% of midfielders

Ranked against 142 midfielders with a comparable sample. Build-up is the value of possessions a player was involved in, with their own shots and final passes removed, so it credits the work before the chance rather than the chance.

Match by match

Match log

35 appearances, oldest first

v Leeds1 shot
0 on target

at Sunderland1 shot
0 on target

v Man Utd2 shots
0 on target

v Brentford1 shot
0 on target

v Bournemouth1 shot
0 on target

v Arsenal1 shot
0 on target

at Palace1 shot
0 on target

1g

v Liverpool1 shot
1 on target

at Brentford2 shots
0 on target

at West Ham1 shot
0 on target

v Sunderland2 shots
0 on target

at Burnley1 shot
0 on target

23 blanksno shot
not placed

Height is shots, solid is on target, and the dashed rule is the 1.5 line. The feed cannot date an appearance with no shot in it, so 23 sits at the end, counted but unplaced.

How to read the ties. Each rate ties back to the league average: solid where the sample is settled, broken where it is still being shrunk toward the league, an open circle where there is no cohort to rank against.