-0.02goals above what the league converts the same chances into
Build-up per 90
0.3712% of Crystal Palace’s build-up value
league 0.24
Adam Wharton ranks 138th of 398 qualified players for attacking involvement, shooting from 21.7m on average, with 24% of their danger coming from set pieces. They carry 11% of Crystal Palace’s attacking involvement, the 3rd largest share in the squad.
Against their position
142 midfielders
Shooting
per 90
Goals
0.0333rd
Non-penalty goals
0.0333rd
xG
0.0415th
Non-penalty xG
0.0416th
Shots
1.1153rd
npxG per shot
0.043rd
Shot distance
21.7m23rd
Set-piece share
24%55th
Goals against xG
-0.255th
2 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2025/26.
Creating
per 90
Assists
0.1778th
Expected assists
0.2390th
Key passes
1.5378th
npxG + xA
0.2768th
xG chain
0.5173rd
xG build-up
0.3784th
Assists against xA
-1.621st
On the ball
per 90
6 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2025/26.
Defending
per 90
Recoveries
5.7591st
Defensive contribution
10.6981st
7 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2025/26.
Discipline
per 90
Yellow cards
4season count
Red cards
1season count
3 figures here come from match-event data, which is not recorded for 2025/26.
Ranked against 142 midfielders with half a match a round or more, the same comparison the compare page makes. Where less is better, such as being dispossessed, the order is turned round, so a high percentile is always the good end. Recoveries and defensive contribution come from the FPL feed and are ranked in its own positions.
This week
Gameweek 7
Next fixture
Gameweek 7
away toBrighton
Sun 18 Oct, 13:00 UTC
Brighton concede 11.7 shots a match and are 0.93× the league norm against midfielders. Roughly an average matchup.
Projected shots
1.03
1.11 per 90 × 0.93
Projected on target
0.19
0.21 per 90 × 0.92
Season rate times what this opponent concedes, over a full ninety minutes. Check availability.
Shots
34 appearances
Over 0.520 of 3459%± 8
Over 1.58 of 3424%± 7
Over 2.53 of 349%± 5
Over 3.51 of 343%± 3
The band is one standard error, the tick the estimate. Blanks count as misses, 14 of 34.
Corners and set piecesSupplies 15% of Crystal Palace’s dead-ball danger, from 19 deliveries that became shots.
On the pitch76% of available minutes.
What would actually have to be replaced. Losing the penalty taker is not the same as losing a proportional slice of Adam Wharton’soutput.
Chances received
who supplies them
Yeremi Pino0.2 xG4 shots, 0g
Daichi Kamada0.1 xG3 shots, 0g
Justin Devenny0.1 xG2 shots, 0g
Jørgen Strand Larsen0.1 xG1 shot, 0g
Will Hughes0.1 xG1 shot, 0g
Chances created
who they supply
Jørgen Strand Larsen1.3 xG5 shots, 2g
Jean-Philippe Mateta1.2 xG8 shots, 0g
Ismaila Sarr0.7 xG3 shots, 1g
Chris Richards0.7 xG3 shots, 0g
Maxence Lacroix0.6 xG4 shots, 0g
Season record
2025/26
Involvement in build-up
excludes their own shots and final passes
Adam Wharton carries 11.7%of Crystal Palace’s build-up value.
Build-up per 900.366
84% of midfielders
Possession value per 900.509
73% of midfielders
Ranked against 142 midfielders with a comparable sample. Build-up is the value of possessions a player was involved in, with their own shots and final passes removed, so it credits the work before the chance rather than the chance.
Match by match
Match log
34 appearances, oldest first
over 1.5
at West Ham1 shot 0 on target
v Liverpool1 shot 0 on target
at Everton1 shot 0 on target
v Bournemouth1 shot 0 on target
at Arsenal1 shot 0 on target
v Brighton1 shot 0 on target
at Wolves1 shot 0 on target
v Man Utd1 shot 1 on target
at Fulham1 shot 0 on target
v Man City3 shots 0 on target
at Leeds1 shot 1 on target
v Spurs3 shots 1 on target
v Villa2 shots 0 on target
at Brighton1 shot 0 on target
v Burnley2 shots 0 on target
v Wolves1 shot 0 on target
at Spurs2 shots 1 on target
v Leeds2 shots 0 on target
v Everton2 shots 0 on target
1g
at Brentford4 shots 2 on target
14 blanksno shot not placed
Height is shots, solid is on target, and the dashed rule is the 1.5 line. The feed cannot date an appearance with no shot in it, so 14 sits at the end, counted but unplaced.
How to read the ties. Each rate ties back to the league average: solid where the sample is settled, broken where it is still being shrunk toward the league, an open circle where there is no cohort to rank against.
