Skip to content
Touchline

Search

Jump to a club, a player, or a section

Wolverhampton Wanderers · 2023/24

npxG per 90
0.19
2 non-penalty goals
xA per 90
0.31
9 assists · 37 key passes
Finishing
-1.1
vs league conversion rate
Build-up per 90
0.13
1524 minutes · 20 games

Pedro Neto ranks 66th of 402 qualified players for attacking involvement, shooting from 17.9m on average. They carry 10% of Wolverhampton Wanderers’ attacking output, the 4th largest share in the squad.

This week

Shots

20 appearances
  • Over 0.590%± 7
  • Over 1.550%± 11
  • Over 2.530%± 10
  • Over 3.510%± 7

Share of appearances clearing each line, with one standard error. Blank appearances count as misses, 2 of 20 here, so these are lower, and more honest, than rates built only from matches where the player got a shot away.

Shots on target

20 appearances
  • Over 0.540%± 11
  • Over 1.520%± 9
  • Over 2.50%± 0

Share of appearances clearing each line, with one standard error. Blank appearances count as misses, 2 of 20 here, so these are lower, and more honest, than rates built only from matches where the player got a shot away.

Where the shots come from

Where they shoot

36 shots
Opponent goalLeftRight
GoalNo goalMark area is the chance’s expected goals

Pedro Neto, 2023/24 · 36 shots in the final 35m, 2 scored. Shape carries the outcome rather than colour, so it reads in print and to anyone who cannot separate the hues.

left
15%
Centre
43%
right
41%

share of their shooting xG

Chance quality

xG per shot, distance, how they arrive
xG per shot
0.091
Shots per 90
2.13
Key passes per 90
2.19
Average shot distance
17.9m
From set pieces
10%

How their chances arrive

Crosses
11%
Through balls
0%
Own dribble
17%
Headed
9%

What they are for

Roles

penalties, set pieces, crossing, partnerships
  • Corners and set piecesSupplies 6% of Wolverhampton Wanderers’ dead-ball danger, from 14 deliveries that became shots.
  • On the pitch45% of the minutes available to them.

Partnerships

  • Feeds Matheus Cunha9 shots, 1.93 xG
  • Feeds Hee-Chan Hwang4 shots, 0.88 xG
  • Feeds Sasa Kalajdzic2 shots, 0.65 xG
  • Feeds João Gomes4 shots, 0.64 xG

A share of the attack says how much runs through Pedro Neto. These say what would have to be replaced. Losing the penalty taker or the corner deliverer is not the same as losing a proportional slice of output, and a partnership cuts both ways: the supplier being absent damages the finisher’s numbers too.

Who they play with

Chances received

who supplies them
  1. Sasa Kalajdzic0.6 xG1 shot · 0g
  2. Pablo Sarabia0.6 xG6 shots · 0g
  3. Matheus Cunha0.3 xG4 shots · 1g
  4. Jean-Ricner Bellegarde0.2 xG3 shots · 0g
  5. Fabio Silva0.2 xG2 shots · 0g

Chances created

who they supply
  1. Matheus Cunha1.9 xG9 shots · 3g
  2. Hee-Chan Hwang0.9 xG4 shots · 3g
  3. Sasa Kalajdzic0.7 xG2 shots · 1g
  4. João Gomes0.6 xG4 shots · 1g
  5. Craig Dawson0.4 xG3 shots · 0g

Season record

Involvement in build-up

excludes their own shots and final passes

Pedro Neto carries 3.1% of Wolverhampton Wanderers’ build-up value.

  • Build-up per 900.130
    30% of forwards
  • Possession value per 900.514
    37% of forwards

Ranked against 107 forwards with a comparable sample. Build-up is the value of possessions a player was involved in with their own shots and final passes removed, so it credits the work before the chance. It is a possession-value measure rather than a passing one: it cannot tell a forty-yard carry from two sideways balls, because no pass or carry record exists in this data.

Match log

most recent first
  • at Liverpool
    1 shot1 OT
  • vs Fulham
    1 shot0 OT
  • vs Sheffield United
    2 shots0 OT
  • at Tottenham
    2 shots0 OT
  • vs Brentford
    3 shots2 OT
  • at Chelsea
    4 shots2 OT
  • vs Manchester United1g
    3 shots1 OT
  • at Brighton
    1 shot0 OT
  • vs Everton
    1 shot0 OT
  • vs Newcastle United
    2 shots1 OT

Solid marks are on target, faded ones off. 2 further appearances produced no shot and are not listed, but are counted in the rates above.