Skip to content
Touchline

Search

Jump to a club, a player, or a section

Chelsea · 2026/27

Romeo Lavia

Small sample. Only 137 minutes this season, so the per-90 rates below swing heavily on a handful of moments. Read them as description, not as form.
npxG per 90
0.81
1 non-penalty goals
xA per 90
0.12
0 assists · 2 key passes
Finishing
-0.2
vs league conversion rate
Build-up per 90
0.36
137 minutes · 2 games

Romeo Lavia ranks 0th of 0 qualified players for attacking involvement, shooting from 5.0m on average, with 100% of their danger coming from set pieces. They carry 20% of Chelsea’s attacking output, the 2nd largest share in the squad.

This week

Next fixture

Gameweek 2

vs Brighton

Sun 30 Aug, 13:00 UTC

Brighton concede 12.5 shots a match and are 0.65× the league norm against midfielders. A difficult one.

Projected shots
1.01

1.31 per 90 × 0.77

Projected on target
0.78

1.31 per 90 × 0.59

Season rate multiplied by what this opponent concedes relative to the league. It assumes a full ninety minutes and takes no account of rotation, so check availability before reading anything into it.

Shots

2 appearances
  • Over 0.5100%± 0
  • Over 1.50%± 0
  • Over 2.50%± 0
  • Over 3.50%± 0

Share of appearances clearing each line, with one standard error. Blank appearances count as misses, 0 of 2 here, so these are lower, and more honest, than rates built only from matches where the player got a shot away.

Shots on target

2 appearances
  • Over 0.5100%± 0
  • Over 1.50%± 0
  • Over 2.50%± 0

Share of appearances clearing each line, with one standard error. Blank appearances count as misses, 0 of 2 here, so these are lower, and more honest, than rates built only from matches where the player got a shot away.

Where the shots come from

Where they shoot

2 shots
Every shotBy zone
Opponent goalLeftRight
GoalNo goalMark area is the chance’s expected goals

Romeo Lavia, 2026/27 · 2 shots in the final 35m, 1 scored. Shape carries the outcome rather than colour, so it reads in print and to anyone who cannot separate the hues.

left
0%
Centre
100%
right
0%

share of their shooting xG

Chance quality

xG per shot, distance, how they arrive
xG per shot
0.615
Shots per 90
1.31
Key passes per 90
1.31
Average shot distance
5.0m
From set pieces
100%

How their chances arrive

Crosses
0%
Through balls
0%
Own dribble
0%
Headed
0%

What they are for

Roles

penalties, set pieces, crossing, partnerships
  • On the pitch76% of the minutes available to them.

Partnerships

  • Feeds João Pedro1 shot, 0.11 xG
  • Feeds Cole Palmer1 shot, 0.07 xG
  • Fed by Jorrel Hato1 shot, 0.59 xG

A share of the attack says how much runs through Romeo Lavia. These say what would have to be replaced. Losing the penalty taker or the corner deliverer is not the same as losing a proportional slice of output, and a partnership cuts both ways: the supplier being absent damages the finisher’s numbers too.

Who they play with

Chances received

who supplies them
  1. Jorrel Hato0.6 xG1 shot · 0g

Chances created

who they supply
  1. João Pedro0.1 xG1 shot · 0g
  2. Cole Palmer0.1 xG1 shot · 0g

Season record

Involvement in build-up

excludes their own shots and final passes

Romeo Lavia carries 7.8% of Chelsea’s build-up value.

  • Build-up per 900.359
    0% of midfielders
  • Possession value per 900.405
    0% of midfielders

Thin sample. Only 137 minutes, so this describes a cameo. Build-up is the value of possessions a player was involved in with their own shots and final passes removed, so it credits the work before the chance. It is a possession-value measure rather than a passing one: it cannot tell a forty-yard carry from two sideways balls, because no pass or carry record exists in this data.

Match log

most recent first
  • vs Brighton1g
    1 shot1 OT
  • at Fulham
    1 shot1 OT

Solid marks are on target, faded ones off.

See Chelsea