Skip to content
Touchline

Search

Jump to a club, a player, or a section

Nottingham Forest · 2025/26

Callum Hudson-Odoi

npxG per 90
0.14
3 non-penalty goals
xA per 90
0.19
4 assists · 44 key passes
Finishing
+0.4
vs league conversion rate
Build-up per 90
0.28
1857 minutes · 30 games

Callum Hudson-Odoi ranks 107th of 398 qualified players for attacking involvement, shooting from 20.1m on average. They carry 8% of Nottingham Forest’s attacking output, the 5th largest share in the squad.

This week

Next fixture

Gameweek 2

away to Liverpool

Sat 29 Aug, 11:30 UTC

Liverpool concede 11.5 shots a match and are 0.97× the league norm against midfielders. Roughly an average matchup.

Projected shots
1.37

1.45 per 90 × 0.94

Projected on target
0.47

0.48 per 90 × 0.98

Season rate multiplied by what this opponent concedes relative to the league. It assumes a full ninety minutes and takes no account of rotation, so check availability before reading anything into it.

Shots

30 appearances
  • Over 0.560%± 9
  • Over 1.523%± 8
  • Over 2.510%± 5
  • Over 3.57%± 5

Share of appearances clearing each line, with one standard error. Blank appearances count as misses, 12 of 30 here, so these are lower, and more honest, than rates built only from matches where the player got a shot away.

Shots on target

30 appearances
  • Over 0.527%± 8
  • Over 1.57%± 5
  • Over 2.50%± 0

Share of appearances clearing each line, with one standard error. Blank appearances count as misses, 12 of 30 here, so these are lower, and more honest, than rates built only from matches where the player got a shot away.

Where the shots come from

Where they shoot

30 shots
Every shotBy zone
Opponent goalLeftRight
GoalNo goalMark area is the chance’s expected goals

Callum Hudson-Odoi, 2025/26 · 30 shots in the final 35m, 3 scored. Shape carries the outcome rather than colour, so it reads in print and to anyone who cannot separate the hues.

left
61%
Centre
29%
right
10%

share of their shooting xG

Chance quality

xG per shot, distance, how they arrive
xG per shot
0.098
Shots per 90
1.45
Key passes per 90
2.13
Average shot distance
20.1m
From set pieces
2%

How their chances arrive

Crosses
7%
Through balls
36%
Own dribble
5%
Headed
0%

What they are for

Roles

penalties, set pieces, crossing, partnerships
  • When it mattered2 of 3 goals came with the game level or Nottingham Forest behind.
  • On the pitch54% of the minutes available to them.

Partnerships

  • Feeds Morgan Gibbs-White10 shots, 1.35 xG
  • Feeds Igor Jesus5 shots, 0.90 xG
  • Fed by Ibrahim Sangare5 shots, 1.15 xG
  • Fed by Neco Williams4 shots, 0.52 xG

A share of the attack says how much runs through Callum Hudson-Odoi. These say what would have to be replaced. Losing the penalty taker or the corner deliverer is not the same as losing a proportional slice of output, and a partnership cuts both ways: the supplier being absent damages the finisher’s numbers too.

Who they play with

Chances received

who supplies them
  1. Ibrahim Sangare1.2 xG5 shots · 2g
  2. Neco Williams0.5 xG4 shots · 0g
  3. Morgan Gibbs-White0.4 xG7 shots · 0g
  4. Dan Ndoye0.3 xG1 shot · 1g
  5. Elliot Anderson0.2 xG4 shots · 0g

Chances created

who they supply
  1. Morgan Gibbs-White1.3 xG10 shots · 1g
  2. Igor Jesus0.9 xG5 shots · 0g
  3. Lorenzo Lucca0.5 xG1 shot · 0g
  4. Elliot Anderson0.3 xG10 shots · 1g
  5. Chris Wood0.3 xG1 shot · 0g

Season record

Involvement in build-up

excludes their own shots and final passes

Callum Hudson-Odoi carries 6.4% of Nottingham Forest’s build-up value.

  • Build-up per 900.278
    56% of midfielders
  • Possession value per 900.539
    80% of midfielders

Ranked against 142 midfielders with a comparable sample. Build-up is the value of possessions a player was involved in with their own shots and final passes removed, so it credits the work before the chance. It is a possession-value measure rather than a passing one: it cannot tell a forty-yard carry from two sideways balls, because no pass or carry record exists in this data.

Tackles, blocks and recoveries

per 90 · 2025/26

They account for 4.3% of their club’s recorded defensive work.

  • Tackles0.69
    6% of MID
  • Blocks, clearances, interceptions1.18
    17% of MID
  • Recoveries3.33
    16% of MID
  • Defensive contribution5.19
    9% of MID

Rates from 1,838 minutes, ranked against 149 midfielders with a comparable sample. The feed publishes season totals rather than a match-by-match record, so there is no hit rate against a line here. That needs the distribution, which no arithmetic on a total can recover. This statistic begins in 2025/26, so there is no earlier season to compare against.

Match log

most recent first
  • vs Aston Villa
    2 shots0 OT
  • at Brighton
    1 shot0 OT
  • vs Liverpool
    1 shot1 OT
  • vs Wolverhampton Wanderers
    4 shots2 OT
  • at Leeds
    1 shot1 OT
  • vs Arsenal
    1 shot0 OT
  • at West Ham
    2 shots0 OT
  • vs Everton
    2 shots0 OT
  • at Fulham
    1 shot0 OT
  • vs Tottenham2g
    3 shots2 OT

Solid marks are on target, faded ones off. 12 further appearances produced no shot and are not listed, but are counted in the rates above.

See Nottingham Forest